Hi Everybody!
We have encountered an error with our Storwize V7000.
Our setup has 6 nodes, with two Brocade SAN SW-es (DS_6505B).
(Earlier we had 4 nodes connected directly to the V7000 via 8 FC cables, so 2 nodes and the SAN SW-es are just installed)
5 nodes are working properly, but NODE-2 is shown Degraded at the hosts page, meanwhile in the Properties >> Port Definitons page everything is Active.
Here is the CLI example about the problem:
IBM_Storwize:STORAGE-5:superuser>lshost
id name port_count iogrp_count status site_id site_name host_cluster_id host_cluster_name protocol owner_id owner_name
0 NODE-1 2 4 online 0 CLUSTER1 scsi
1 NODE-2 2 4 degraded 0 CLUSTER1 scsi
2 SERVER-9 2 4 online 1 CLUSTER2 scsi
3 SERVER-10 2 4 online 1 CLUSTER2 scsi
4 NODE-3 2 4 online 2 CLUSTER3 scsi
5 NODE-4 2 4 online 2 CLUSTER3 scsi
IBM_Storwize:STORAGE-5:superuser>lshost 1
id 1
name NODE-2
port_count 2
type generic
mask 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
iogrp_count 4
status degraded
site_id
site_name
host_cluster_id 0
host_cluster_name CLUSTER1
protocol scsi
status_policy redundant
status_site all
WWPN 1000001*********
node_logged_in_count 2
state active
WWPN 1000001*********
node_logged_in_count 2
state active
owner_id
owner_name
The SANs are configured with the same commands.
SAN-1 has ST5-CAN1/1, ST5-CAN1/3, ST5-CAN2/1, ST5-CAN2/3 connected.
SAN-2 has ST5-CAN1/2, ST5-CAN1/4, ST5-CAN2/2, ST5-CAN2/4 connected.
TVT_STORAGE-5_PORT3 for example includes CAN1/3 & CAN2/3 WWPNs (Virtualized and physical), and the zones are for this node are the following:
zone: Z-TVT-NODE-2_HBA1_PORT0-TVT_STORAGE-5_PORT3
TVT_NODE-2_HBA1_PORT0; TVT_STORAGE-5_PORT3
zone: Z-TVT-NODE-2_HBA2_PORT0-TVT_STORAGE-5_PORT4
TVT_NODE-2_HBA2_PORT0; TVT_STORAGE-5_PORT4
fcping is working properly I think (TVT_NODE-2_HBA1_PORT0 is connected to SAN-1 & TVT_NODE-2_HBA2_PORT0 is connected to SAN-2):
SAN-1:admin> fcping 10:00:00:1*:**:**:**:** (TVT_NODE-2_HBA1_PORT0)
Destination: 10:00:00:1*:**:**:**:**
Pinging 10:00:00:1*:**:**:**:** [0x010300] with 12 bytes of data:
received reply from 10:00:00:1*:**:**:**:**: 12 bytes time:722 usec
received reply from 10:00:00:1*:**:**:**:**: 12 bytes time:695 usec
received reply from 10:00:00:1*:**:**:**:**: 12 bytes time:628 usec
received reply from 10:00:00:1*:**:**:**:**: 12 bytes time:720 usec
received reply from 10:00:00:1*:**:**:**:**: 12 bytes time:660 usec
5 frames sent, 5 frames received, 0 frames rejected, 0 frames timeout
Round-trip min/avg/max = 628/685/722 usec
SAN-1:admin> fcping 10:00:00:1*:**:**:**:** (TVT_NODE-2_HBA2_PORT0)
fcping: Error destination wwn invalid
SAN-2:admin> fcping 10:00:00:1*:**:**:**:** (TVT_NODE-2_HBA1_PORT0)
fcping: Error destination wwn invalid
SAN-2:admin> fcping 10:00:00:1*:**:**:**:** (TVT_NODE-2_HBA2_PORT0)
Destination: 10:00:00:1*:**:**:**:**
Pinging 10:00:00:1*:**:**:**:** [0x010300] with 12 bytes of data:
received reply from 10:00:00:1*:**:**:**:**: 12 bytes time:660 usec
received reply from 10:00:00:1*:**:**:**:**: 12 bytes time:697 usec
received reply from 10:00:00:1*:**:**:**:**: 12 bytes time:625 usec
received reply from 10:00:00:1*:**:**:**:**: 12 bytes time:717 usec
received reply from 10:00:00:1*:**:**:**:**: 12 bytes time:627 usec
5 frames sent, 5 frames received, 0 frames rejected, 0 frames timeout
Round-trip min/avg/max = 625/665/717 usec
NODE-2 is restarted and updated. What shall we check next? Would it be a Storage, SAN, or NODE missconfiguration?
Thx for the advices!
------------------------------
Krisztián Révész
------------------------------