Skip main navigation (Press Enter).
Log in
Toggle navigation
Community
Topic Groups
Champions
Meet the Champions
Program overview
Rising Champions
IBM Champions group
User Groups
Find your User Group
Program overview
Events
TechXchange Conference
Community events
All IBM events
Participate
IBM Community Hub
Welcome Corner
Blogging
Member directory
Community leaders
Resources
Badge Program
IBM Support Customer Day
Log in
IBM Cloudability
×
Cloudability
A place for Cloudability product users to learn, connect, share and grow together.
#Cloudability
#Automation
Group Home
Threads
753
Blogs
55
Upcoming Events
0
Library
104
Members
1.3K
View Only
Share
Share on LinkedIn
Share on X
Share on Facebook
Back to discussions
Expand all
|
Collapse all
Finding Value in Imperfection: Why Perceived Precision Is Blocking Real Savings
1.
Finding Value in Imperfection: Why Perceived Precision Is Blocking Real Savings
Like
John Schlegelmilch
Posted Tue April 14, 2026 08:49 AM
|
view attached
Reply
Options Dropdown
I'm excited to share a new white paper:
Finding Value in Imperfection: Why Perceived Precision Is Blocking Real Savings
In many FinOps organizations, cloud commitment strategy is still shaped by one dominant instinct: avoid stranded spend at all costs.
That sounds disciplined, but it can create a blind spot.
When teams focus too heavily on minimizing over-commitment risk, they often under-commit and leave significant savings uncaptured month after month. In many cases, the cost of that caution is greater than the risk they are trying to avoid.
This paper challenges that mindset and makes the case for a more balanced, economically grounded approach to commitment management.
A few core ideas explored in the paper:
- Missed savings should be reported alongside stranded spend
- Slight over-allocation can be financially superior to chronic under-coverage
- Coverage strategy should be set by workload tier, not broad averages
- Governance guardrails can enable smarter, faster commitment decisions
- Commitment optimization should evolve from static analysis into an operational discipline
The goal is not reckless over-commitment. The goal is optimal coverage with defined guardrails.
My hope is that this helps move the FinOps conversation beyond perceived precision and toward better financial outcomes, stronger governance, and more strategic use of cloud investments.
I'd love to hear how others in the FinOps community are thinking about this balance today.
hashtag
#
FinOps
hashtag
#
CloudFinancialManagement
hashtag
#
CloudOptimization
hashtag
#
SavingsPlans
hashtag
#
ReservedInstances
hashtag
#
TBM
hashtag
#
CloudStrategy
hashtag
#
FinOpsFoundation
Attachment note:
Attach the PDF version of the white paper directly to the LinkedIn post.
------------------------------
John Schlegelmilch
Advisor
IBM
804-380-1083
------------------------------
Attachment(s)
finding value in imperfection - white paper draft for del...pdf
273 KB
1 version
×
New Best Answer
This thread already has a best answer. Would you like to mark this message as the new best answer?
Related Content
Finding Value in Imperfection: Why Perceived Precision Is Blocking Real Savings
John Schlegelmilch
Added Mon April 13, 2026
Library Entry
NPV and WACC: Your Financial Compass for FinOps Decisions
Leiyian Motongo
Added Mon July 29, 2024
Blog Entry
New Education: Introduction to Commitment Manager
Florence Matthews
Added Mon December 14, 2020
Blog Entry
Notice: Consolidated Commitment Features and Other Related Enhancements
Andrew Midgley
Added Thu August 29, 2024
Library Entry
FinOps - Does adding new team members always mean more savings?
Justin Kean
Added Mon February 14, 2022
Discussion Thread
1
Copyright � 2026 IBM Community. All rights reserved.
Powered by Higher Logic