IBM Champions

IBM Champions Banner

IBM Champions

Engage with IBM Champions and top advocates


#Champions
 View Only

Introducing the next evolution of the IBM Rising Champions Program

By Kathryn DuPont posted 15 days ago

  

TLDR: What’s New with IBM Rising Champions

The IBM Rising Champions Program has evolved to better reflect how real advocacy works.

We are moving beyond a numeric‑only model to recognize meaningful, credible advocacy through a balance of clear activity guidelines and qualitative evaluation. Minimum activity expectations still apply, but progression is guided by intent, consistency, and the IBM tech community impact, not volume alone.

Advocacy must be voluntary, sustained over time, and extend beyond job responsibilities or business promotion. Badges are earned through assessment, not automatically awarded.

Read the full blog below to understand what’s changing, what’s staying the same, and how progression works at each level.

From Counting Activity to Recognizing Meaningful Advocacy

The IBM Champions program has always recognized people who go beyond the scope of their day jobs to share knowledge, strengthen communities, and influence the extended IBM ecosystem in real, lasting ways.

We created the IBM Rising Champions Program in 2023 to support that journey. As advocacy itself evolves, so does the program.

This updated Rising Champions model reflects a simple truth: not all advocacy looks the same, and not all value can be measured by volume alone. Our goal is to bring greater clarity, balance, and intention to how advocacy is recognized on the pathway to Champion.

What’s Changing (and What Isn’t)

What’s not changing

Rising Champions is not abandoning structure. There are still minimum participation expectations at each level. These provide a shared baseline and help answer a very practical question:

Am I doing enough to be considered?

What is changing

We are looking more deliberately beyond the numbers.

Rather than focusing only on activity counts, evaluation places greater emphasis on:

  • The quality and intent behind activities

  • Consistency over time, or exceptional contributions that reflect extensive impact; but not one‑off bursts

  • The value created for others

  • Contributions to a healthy, trusted technology community

Simply put, we are shifting from counting activity to understanding contribution.

Minimum Activity Expectations (Clarity Still Matters)

To be transparent, there are still defined participation guidelines for early and mid‑stage levels:

  • IBM Contributor: Completion of at least three (3) eligible advocacy activities.

  • IBM Advocate: Completion of at least six (6) eligible advocacy activities, including both core activities and a meaningful mix of extended activities.

As advocates progress, expectations evolve to include a greater proportion of extended activities, which typically require more intention, preparation, leadership, or responsibility.

For example, Core activities often include:

  • Community participation and discussion

  • Social advocacy that adds at least minimal perspective or learning

  • Event participation

  • Product reviews

For example, Extended activities may include:

  • Speaking or presenting

  • Publishing deeply technical, thought leadership, or in-depth content - this applies to social advocacy as well, where we look for original content and goes beyond re-sharing

  • Leading communities or user groups

  • Providing structured or strategic feedback

Importantly, no single format is required. For example, advocates who primarily contribute on LinkedIn may fully meet (or exceed) expectations when their posts or articles demonstrate depth, insight, reflection, or guidance rather than simple amplification.

To see the full range of evaluated activities, please visit the Understanding Activities article, where we list the Champions Activity roster.

Influencer: Competitive and Evaluation‑Ready

At the Influencer level, expectations intentionally shift.

Rather than publishing numeric thresholds, the Influencer designation reflects advocates who demonstrate:

  • Sustained, visible leadership

  • Deep IBM-product focused expertise

  • A strong mix of core and extended activities

  • Clear influence on communities, conversations, or ecosystem direction

Influencer is not equivalent to Champion.

Instead, Influencers are considered evaluation‑ready for Champion consideration. Progression at this level is competitive, selective, and based on demonstrated impact over time. There are no guarantees: only alignment, consistency, and readiness for deeper trust and responsibility.

Numbers Enable Eligibility, Not Automatic Progression

Meeting minimum participation expectations makes an individual eligible for evaluation. It does not guarantee a badge or progression to the next level. Rising Champions are intentionally evaluated because advocacy is contextual and highly variable. Two people can complete similar activities and create very different outcomes.

Evaluation helps us understand:

  • What changed because of the advocacy

  • Who was helped, informed, or influenced

  • Whether contributions reflect genuine effort and care

  • How activities fit into a longer‑term pattern

Badges that are earned…not handed out…remain meaningful.

Consistency Over Time Is a Real Signal

As participants move from Contributor to Advocate to Influencer, the program looks more at:

  • Consistent engagement (or, exceptional contributions)

  • Intentional advocacy

  • A recognizable, trusted presence

  • Ongoing commitment, not one‑off moments

This applies equally to aspiring candidates, current Rising Champions, and experienced Champions.

Advocacy Must Go Beyond Your Job or Your Business

Advocacy must extend beyond:

  • Day‑to‑day job expectations

  • Employer‑directed marketing

  • Sales motions for your organization

  • Pure self‑ or company promotion

Any reported activities reflecting these may affect eligibility or progression. Trusted tech ecosystems grow when people contribute because they care—not because they are required to.

What does count is advocacy done because you choose to:

  • Share lessons learned using IBM technologies

  • Help others navigate technology or careers

  • Build and support community

  • Offer thoughtful, relatable perspectives

  • Improve the IBM tech community as a whole

Advocacy for this program must also explicitly include IBM products or technologies, or open source initiatives or developer activities in which IBM is invested. When you contribute activity around products sitting on top of, or in conjunction with, an IBM stack — that activity may not count as advocacy under our definition.

A Program for the Whole Pathway to Champion

Rising Champions is not a race; and the levels are markers along a pathway many IBM Champions know well.

The program exists to:

  • Support aspiring advocates

  • Recognize meaningful contributions at all levels and throughout the year

  • Encourage sustainability over performance

  • Create a clearer, stronger path toward Champion

Wherever you are on your journey, this model is designed to meet you there and support where you’re going.

Learn more about each level: ContributorAdvocate, and Influencer.

Get started today!

If you are new to the IBM Rising Champions get started by applying today by filling in our Candidate Application.  Once you’ve applied, you (along with other Rising Champions and Champions) will report advocacy activities using the Activity Reporting Form. Credible evidence and context are essential to support the thoughtful evaluation across all program levels. For more information and guidance about what to report and what we evaluate, please visit the Understanding Activities article, where we list the Champions Activity roster. 

As always, the program reserves the right to update categories and badge/program definitions.
 

#ibmchampions-featured-blog

8 comments
140 views

Permalink

Comments

2 days ago

@Michael Kasteel

Currently, we do not have a view for those who submit activities to see their past submissions. We are working on it.  However, if you email the team, we can give you a quick report of your submissions.  In addition, I recently posted a blog that is designed to be more specific about how advocates and Champions receive credit for their activities. In addition, another indicator of activity eligibility and impact will be the receipt of badges from our program.  The programs are deeply interwoven, so yes, there will be consideration across both programs. 


Thank you so much for your great questions! /kd 

2 days ago

@Muhammad Tahir Ashraf All positive change is good! :) /kd 

2 days ago

Hi @Oliver Mark
Yes participating in events and user groups can be challenging geographically. But there are several other ways to advocate. What is important is how advocates are sharing, extending information, and creating value to the technology community. That can be done by many of the other activities we've communicated this year.  

Regarding the evaluation season and Champion renewals, we will be providing updates later in 2026. 

Cheers!
/kd 

2 days ago

@Raef Mansour You are in the system, so all you need to do is report your advocacy activity using this form . Please use IBM Champion Program ID when you report your activities so that all your activities are consolidated under your ID. 

11 days ago

Hello,
since it's related to 2026, Is it possible to submit multiple forms?
Are there consolidated or considered?

13 days ago

This is quite a change. Ceertainly, is aims to differentiate between "cut & paste" und "real effort". Will be interesting how the mechanics will work to evaluate. Maybe Bob is helping.... 

What I am missing is the geografic aspect. Let's take "Event participation" for example. It is a lot easier to participate in some regions due to the amount of events "in reach". And there are regions with little to no events. Just saying that this might add additional complexity. 

Also, some other participation (like conversations right here in the Community) shouldn't be needed to be reported, rather that should be something which can be tracked automatically - and maybe AI can help to evaluate between an "I agree" post and some relevant content. Just a thought. 

Oh, by the way. Will there be a difference in eval for new rising champions and those renewing their status as current Champions (aka the short questionaire)?

In either way, it's definitely going to be fun working through the year with those new parameters.

14 days ago

Looks amazing! It’s going to be fun earning an Influencer Badge.

15 days ago

I think these are meaningful and positive changes.

I have known some prior Champions and, at times, wondered how the badge was awarded without fully appreciating how much the previous model relied on activity volume. 

I know I try to make my advocacy meaningful for all of the brands I represent: the products, IBM, my company, and myself. With that in mind, I had a couple of questions about how the new model will work.

I have been lodging some of my activities through Airtable, but I do not believe there is currently a way to go back and see my individual submissions. How will participants know whether their contributions have been assessed? For example, will individual activities be assessed within Airtable, and will we be able to see the assessment outcome or receive a notification, similar to the confirmation emails we receive when submitting activities?

I can see the distinction between core and extended activities, and I understand that progression will now involve more qualitative assessment. However, how will participants know whether a particular contribution has been assessed as eligible, meaningful, or impactful?

These changes introduce stronger stage gates on the pathway toward the IBM Champion title. Are similar changes being considered for the full IBM Champion program itself, or are these updates currently focused only on the Rising Champion pathway?